Texas Lawyer
For much of the last century, Ropes & Gray was known primarily as a top–tier Boston law firm. But a pair of high–profile mergers during the past ten years has greatly expanded the firm’s reach and its expertise. A 2003 merger with Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt & Maynard boosted...
Read the Ropes & Gray LLP firm profile.
As an intellectual property attorney, the federal jurisdiction of patent-related cases always seemed clear to me. 28 U.S.C. 1338 provides that: "The district courts shall have original jurisdiction o
Originally Published: The Legal Intelligencer
...March, zeroing in on Dorsey & Whitney; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton; Ropes & Gray; and Shearman & Sterling, among others. Seven former Howrey partners at...
Originally Published: The Recorder
...mergers involving the firm's clients. In 2009, an attorney at Ropes & Gray was charged with providing inside information on corporate transactions involving his...
Originally Published: The Recorder
...by Thomas Melsheimer of Fish & Richardson and James Batcheler of Ropes & Gray in the East Texas trial last year. At least...
The America Invents Act, the historic 2011 law that reforms the U.S. patent system, sees its second phase take effect this week, creating new rules in the complex world of patents that in-house couns
Originally Published: Corporate Counsel
...A Boston federal judge has allowed former Ropes & Gray associate John H. Ray III to add defamation and invasion of...
Originally Published: National Law Journal
Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney is keeping more than a few Am Law attorneys busy in his quest to find a running mate. Beth Myers, a former litigation associate at Akin Gump St
...new winners: Davis Polk & Wardwell; Goodwin Procter; Nixon Peabody; Ropes & Gray; Sutherland Asbill & Brennan; and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr...
Type what you're looking for into the search box and hit enter or click the search button. Law.com Search will search for relevant content and will display the results below. Often you'll find just what you're looking for right away.
Here are a few tips for finding what you need:
Too many results? Refine your search using the filters on the left side of the page. You can select a date range, a specific source, the type of content, or a topic. The available filters will depend on what is present in the content, so the list will change in context to the search results you have found.
You can also search within your search results. Just underneath the search box, click "Search within results" to add one more term to the the words and filters you've already set up.
Too few results? Law.com Search will always show you what words you searched on and what filters you've used under "Your Search" at the top of the page. Try taking off some of the filters you've set up if you need to expand the results.