National Law JournalA federal judge has slashed by more than half the plaintiffs fees in a closely watched consumer class action involving Bluetooth headsets, concluding that "no reasonable paying client" would
Five plaintiffs firms that obtained a class action settlement over alleged headlight defects in the Toyota Prius have petitioned a federal appeals court to overturn a trial judge's rejection of $4.7
A lawyer whose objection to a settlement in the Bluetooth hearing-loss litigation prompted a federal appeals court to reject the deal has renewed his protest, arguing that the deal continues to demon
Plaintiffs' attorneys in the Motorola Bluetooth headset litigation, whose fees a federal appeals court last year deemed potentially excessive, have agreed to a revised calculation submitted by defens
...necessary due diligence," wrote David Casselman, a partner at Wasserman, Comden, Casselman & Esensten in Tarzana, Calif., who represents the actors. "Defendants are...
Plaintiffs' attorneys in the Motorola Bluetooth headset litigation — in which a federal appeals court rejected a settlement last year on the ground that the $800,000 award might be excessive &m
Lawyers on both sides of a settlement over hearing loss claims involving Motorola's Bluetooth headsets are insisting the attorney fees were not inflated, despite concerns voiced by a federal appeals
...five firms: Girard Gibbs, which asked for $1.9 million; Wasserman, Comden, Casselman & Esensten of Tarzana, Calif., which sought $720,000; Initiative Legal Group...
...included $1.9 million to Girard Gibbs; $720,000 to Wasserman, Comden, Casselman & Esensten of Tarzana, Calif.; $250,000 to Los Angeles-based Arias...
...case are the Garcia Law Firm in Long Beach, Calif.; Wasserman, Comden, Casselman & Esensten in Tarzana, Calif.; Chicago's Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney...
Type what you're looking for into the search box and hit enter or click the search button. Law.com Search will search for relevant content and will display the results below. Often you'll find just what you're looking for right away.
Here are a few tips for finding what you need:
Too many results? Refine your search using the filters on the left side of the page. You can select a date range, a specific source, the type of content, or a topic. The available filters will depend on what is present in the content, so the list will change in context to the search results you have found.
You can also search within your search results. Just underneath the search box, click "Search within results" to add one more term to the the words and filters you've already set up.
Too few results? Law.com Search will always show you what words you searched on and what filters you've used under "Your Search" at the top of the page. Try taking off some of the filters you've set up if you need to expand the results.